DW  RETRO

Diesel History Retrospective: Oldsmobile’s Other Diesel

Say “Oldsmobile diesel” and most people think of the trouble-prone 350-cid (5.7 liter) V-8 that plagued GM’s full-size cars in the late 1970s and early 1980s. But there was another Oldsmobile diesel in that time frame, and it was actually a decent engine — and yet it was largely overshadowed by the bad reputation of its V-8 sister.

Introduced in 1982, the 4.3L V-6 was loosely based on the improved 1981 version of the 5.7L LF9 diesel, with which it shared many parts. Some assume that because the displacement is the same as the Chevy 4.3L gasoline V-6, the two engines are related or interchangeable. Not so, and far from it. The Olds 5.7L diesel block was based on Oldsmobile’s second-generation gas V-8 architecture with the same bore and stroke of the Olds 350 gasser. (In fact, the block is so similar to the gasser that it’s prized as a super-duty replacement block for race engines.)

The 4.3L diesel had the same bore and stroke as the 350 diesel, but the crankshaft was specially designed with 30-degree offsets between the crankshaft throws for the V-6’s “even-fire” firing order. Like the 5.7L diesel, it was naturally aspirated and used a Stanadyne DB series injection pump.

While the 5.7-liter V-8 suffered from some rather serious teething problems when first introduced (rushed to production, it was a sound design that was weakened by cost cutting and poor execution), the truth is that most of the issues were rather short-lived, though time has embellished their severity. GM owned the diesel car market in the 1980s; in 1981 alone, they sold 310,000 diesel cars, which was 60 percent of the diesel car market. GM had already addressed many of the 350’s problems, and by the time the V-6 came along in 1982, it benefited from the General’s hard-won experience.

The Dark Maple Red Metallic paint may be fading but you can still see the lovely lines that made the Cutlass Ciera Oldsmobile’s best selling car for 14 years. This one was built in March of 1983 and sold to the Verhoff family by Jack Howell Chevrolet-Oldsmobile in Ottawa, Ohio, for the princely sum of $10,818. Base price for the LS Sedan was $8,892. Add to that the 4.3L diesel ($500), four-season air conditioning ($725), body side moldings ($55), accent stripe ($42), rocker panel moldings ($56), 14-inch radial tire upgrade ($36.60) and block heater ($42). There was a credit of $56 for a radio delete.
The Dark Maple Red Metallic paint may be fading but you can still see the lovely lines that made the Cutlass Ciera Oldsmobile’s best selling car for 14 years. This one was built in March of 1983 and sold to the Verhoff family by Jack Howell Chevrolet-Oldsmobile in Ottawa, Ohio, for the princely sum of $10,818. Base price for the LS Sedan was $8,892. Add to that the 4.3L diesel ($500), four-season air conditioning ($725), body side moldings ($55), accent stripe ($42), rocker panel moldings ($56), 14-inch radial tire upgrade ($36.60) and block heater ($42). There was a credit of $56 for a radio delete.

DW-1503-RETRO-02

Other than the black smoke and the noise, there was little to signify a diesel from a gasser aside from the badge on the trunk lid. The diesel had a slightly larger fuel tank than the gas cars, which gave them a cruising range of around 600 miles.
Other than the black smoke and the noise, there was little to signify a diesel from a gasser aside from the badge on the trunk lid. The diesel had a slightly larger fuel tank than the gas cars, which gave them a cruising range of around 600 miles.

One of the biggest problems with the 350 diesels was water in the fuel ruining the injection pump and injectors. The 4.3L was protected with a water separator as well as a better fuel filter. Another major problem for the 350 were the weak torque-to-yield (TTY) head bolts and too few of them. The 4.3L still used TTY bolts (albeit better ones) but had six bolts per cylinder rather than four. Other 350 issues, including main cap bolts that were too short and an improperly balanced crankshaft, were rookie problems not repeated by the 4.3’s engineers.

The 4.3L came in two versions. The LT6 was an all-iron engine designed for the rear-drive G-body cars (Buick Regal, Chevy Malibu and Monte Carlo, Olds Cutlass Supreme and Cutlass Calais), while the LT7 was designed for front-wheel-drive cars like the Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera. The engines were significantly different, with the front-drive LT7 engine employing aluminum heads and a low-profile die-cast aluminum intake manifold. As a result, the LT7 was 62 lbs lighter than the LT6. The LT7 also had a serpentine belt system, so the accessory mountings were very much different that the rear-drive engine.

Smaller differences included different blocks, with the front-drive version weighing 11 lbs. less and being a little more compact. Both engines used roller tappets, the same ones used in the 5.7, the later 6.2 diesel and even Ford’s 6.9. The crankshaft was nodular iron, with four main bearings and rolled fillets. The pistons were autothermic with a cast iron top ring groove protector and a full floating pin. The top ring was barrel-shaped and moly-coated.

The Olds engineers thought they were metrically hip when they published a power and torque graph in kilowatts and Newton meters. We know the peaks were 85 hp and 165 lb-ft and we can still see the curves.
The Olds engineers thought they were metrically hip when they published a power and torque graph in kilowatts and Newton meters. We know the peaks were 85 hp and 165 lb-ft and we can still see the curves.
Even though this was the baseline interior, it’s not badly appointed. Diesel models had a lot of extra sound deadening to keep them quiet and comfortable. A/C was not standard but this car has it.
Even though this was the baseline interior, it’s not badly appointed. Diesel models had a lot of extra sound deadening to keep them quiet and comfortable. A/C was not standard but this car has it.

The 4.3L was innovative and an engine with several firsts or near firsts. It was the first mass-produced V-6 diesel designed solely for passenger car use and only the third road-going V-6 diesel offered in the American market. It followed the medium-duty GM V-6 Toro-Flo truck diesel (the smallest of which was 351 cid and the biggest 478 cid) of the early 1960s and the 426-cid 6V71 of the late 1950s. There were a few other V-6 diesels going back to the 1940s and 1950s, including a few big stationary, rail or marine units from GM and a couple of low-volume truck engines from Europe. There are quite a number of V-6 diesels today, including the popular VM unit now appearing in Ram half-tons.

The 4.3L was also one of the first diesels with an aluminum head. At the time it was built, the only commonly seen aluminum-head diesel here was the Volkswagen Rabbit’s 1.5L four-cylinder, which had debuted just a few years earlier. Mercedes followed shortly with an aluminum head diesel in 1986. GM claimed the aluminum heads on the transverse 4.3L were the first high-volume application of the lost foam casting process. A polystyrene pattern was made and then surrounded by fluidized sand. Molten aluminum was then poured into the mold, which vaporized the foam. The heads were successful in the short term and have proved long lasting; cracked heads on the 4.3L are not unknown but like most aluminum heads, failures are usually related to overheating or poor maintenance. In the case of the 4.3L, the cast iron heads from the LT6 are a direct replacement.

aitf

Power output was the same for both front- and rear-drive versions: 85 hp at 3,600 rpm and 165 lb-ft of torque at 1,600 rpm. Though the numbers are modest, the engines actually delivered reasonable performance in the under-3,000-lb front-drive cars. (The heavier rear-drive cars were anemic by comparison.) The EPA rated the 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera diesel for 28 mpg city, 41 highway and 33 combined. Converted to the modern rating system, that would be 24 city, 39 highway and 31 combined.

In 1983, Olds engineers modified a Cutlass Ciera coupe as a sporty concept car. Calling it the Tuned Induction Diesel, it featured a specially designed intake manifold, updated injection pump and free-flow exhaust. The new intake used Helmholtz tuning, which involves finding the perfect length and diameter intake runner. In this case, the runners were much longer than stock and attached to dual plenums. The increased airflow allowed a larger fuel shot, and output jumped to 101 hp and torque to 180 lb-ft. The extra grunt provided a 10-second 0-60 time and a 17.5-second quarter-mile at 77.2 mph (both with a five-speed manual not available in the standard Olds cars). A few period magazines covered the car and the Olds engineers were quick to point out the intake tuning was cheaper than a turbo, albeit with more limited gains. Had the diesels remained popular, some version of this concept engine would likely have appeared in production.

By the mid-1980s it was clear that diesels weren’t going to remain as popular as GM had hoped, so they phased out all of their diesel cars after the end of the 1985 model year—just as all the bugs had been worked out. Had they been more popular, GM’s diesel cars could have continued to evolve into sleek, fast, Mercedes-like fuel-sippers, although some argue that had the engines been more evolved from the start, they might have been more popular. A common thought is, “What if GM had turbocharged the engines?” That would have been great but would have added significantly to the cost, and while we diesel enthusiasts might have been willing to pay a premium, GM decided that the general car buying public wouldn’t. Put it into the automotive “woulda, coulda, shoulda” file. DW

[divider]THE RIGHT CAR FOR THE TIMES[/divider]

The mid-size Oldsmobile Cutlass Ciera made its debut in 1982, sharing GM’s new A-body front-wheel-drive platform with the Chevrolet Celebrity, Buick Century and Pontiac 6000. Engine choices for the A-bodies were a base 2.5-liter gasoline four, a 3.0L gasser V-6, and a new 4.3L (261-cid) V-6 diesel.

The Cutlass Ciera was Olds’ best selling model for most of its 1982-1996 run. The diesel was an option on 1982-1982 Cieras, and it came exclusively with a TH125C three-speed automatic transaxle with a lockup torque converter, this despite the fact that a four-speed auto was soon introduced for the gassers and Chevy offered a diesel Celebrity with a five-speed manual.

The Cutlass Ciera came as a two-door coupe or a four-door sedan. The base Cutlass Ciera LS was nicely appointed but the Brougham model gave it a little more of that “Big Daddy Caddy” feel, while the ES had more of a youthful, sporty look. Most of the major options were a la carte and included six-way power seats, sunroof, power locks, tilt steering wheel, four-season A/C, and many other luxury goodies.

The 4.3L diesel was the biggest and heaviest powerplant to be fitted into the front drive A-body platform, and it pretty much fills the engine compartment. The 4.3 was shorter than the 350 but just as wide. The serpentine belt setup used on the front-drive cars both lightened and shortened the engine.
The 4.3L diesel was the biggest and heaviest powerplant to be fitted into the front drive A-body platform, and it pretty much fills the engine compartment. The 4.3 was shorter than the 350 but just as wide. The serpentine belt setup used on the front-drive cars both lightened and shortened the engine.

DW-1503-RETRO-07


 

 

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the Oldsmobile 350 diesel engine, and why is it infamous?

The Oldsmobile 350 diesel engine was General Motors’ venture into the diesel passenger car market during the late 1970s and early 1980s. Designed with fuel efficiency in mind, it was based on GM’s gasoline V8 engines but adapted for diesel fuel. Despite its promising premise, this engine quickly gained a notorious reputation.

The Roots of Infamy
  • Design Flaws:The transition from gasoline to diesel with minimal redesign led to significant issues. The engine was plagued with problems like blown head gaskets, stretching head bolts, and overall reliability concerns.
  • Consumer Experience:The frequent mechanical failures resulted in a poor driving experience, leaving owners frustrated and leading to negative word-of-mouth.
  • Economic Timing:Launched during a period of fuel crises, the market was primed for innovative fuel-saving solutions. Unfortunately, the Oldsmobile 350 diesel’s technical shortcomings overshadowed its theoretical benefits.
The Legacy

Despite its flaws, some enthusiasts are still drawn to the challenge of rebuilding or modifying the Oldsmobile 350 diesel. These projects often focus on rectifying its original engineering issues or repurposing the engine for unique applications. However, its legacy remains a cautionary tale of hasty innovation without rigorous testing.

 

How does timing gear alignment affect the performance of the Oldsmobile diesel engine?

Impact of Timing Gear Alignment on Oldsmobile Diesel Performance

Correct timing gear alignment is crucial for ensuring optimal performance in Oldsmobile diesel engines. When rebuilding or installing this engine type, precision in aligning the timing gears directly influences the engine’s efficiency and longevity.

Key Points:
  • Engine Synchronization:Proper alignment ensures synchronization between the crankshaft and camshaft. This synchronization is critical for accurate valve opening and closing, which in turn affects engine combustion efficiency.
  • Fuel Injection Timing:Aligning the timing gears sets a baseline for fuel injection. This baseline alignment is critical; however, achieving perfect injection timing requires a precise tool. Using a piezo-electric adapter alongside a timing light allows for fine-tuning the base settings, ensuring optimized fuel delivery.
  • Prevention of Engine Issues:Misalignment can lead to improper air-fuel mixture timing, resulting in rough engine performance, potential stalling, or increased wear and tear. Over time, this can lead to premature engine failure, diminishing the longevity of your investment.

By ensuring accurate timing gear alignment and using the right tools for precise adjustments, you promote smoother engine operation and extend the engine’s lifespan.

 

What components and modifications are being used in the Oldsmobile 350 diesel engine rebuild project?

Components and Modifications in the Oldsmobile 350 Diesel Engine Rebuild

Engine Block and Pistons
  • Block Boring: The engine block has been bored .020 inches over, enhancing performance and accommodating new components.
  • Pistons: High-quality Dualoy pistons have been selected for improved durability and efficiency.
Rings and Valvetrain
  • Piston Rings: The rebuild uses Total Seal rings, featuring a second ring that is gap-less, which helps to improve sealing and reduce blow-by.
  • Valves: New seats and guides have been installed in the cylinder head, along with four new intake valves and a custom-made exhaust valve crafted from an old intake valve.
Fuel System
  • The fuel pump and nozzles are currently undergoing refurbishment to ensure optimal performance, carried out by specialists at a renowned facility in Findlay, Ohio.

This meticulous selection of components and modifications aims to optimize fuel economy, following the original goals of the engine’s creators in the late 1970s. The finished engine will be paired with a T5 5-speed transmission and installed in a third or fourth-generation F-body car, continuing the project’s quest for efficiency and performance.

 

What is the cost of rebuilding an injection pump for the Oldsmobile 350 diesel engine, and what are the alternatives?

Cost and Alternatives for Rebuilding an Injection Pump on the Oldsmobile 350 Diesel Engine

When it comes to rebuilding the injection pump for an Oldsmobile 350 diesel engine, the expense can be a significant consideration. If you opt for a professional rebuild at a specialized facility like International Fuel Systemsin Findlay, Ohio, the cost for this service typically starts at around $825. This price may cover the basic rebuild and may include some upgrades.

Exploring Cost-Effective Alternatives

If the professional rebuild cost seems steep, consider these alternatives:

  • DIY Rebuild: If you possess the tools and skills, tackling the rebuild yourself can be a viable, cost-saving option. Though it requires time and expertise, doing it yourself can significantly reduce expenses.
  • Parts and Upgrades: Investigate the cost of individual components, such as nozzles, which may also need attention. Direct parts purchase can sometimes be more affordable, and performing upgrades simultaneously might offer better performance improvements.

In summary, while a professional rebuild is convenient, a DIY approach is worth considering if you have the necessary mechanical knowledge and resources. Balancing cost with your ability to perform the work will help you decide the best course of action.

 

How can over-oiling issues in Oldsmobile cylinder heads be addressed?

Addressing Over-Oiling Issues in Oldsmobile Cylinder Heads

Over-oiling in Oldsmobile cylinder heads can lead to significant performance and maintenance challenges. Fortunately, there are several effective strategies to tackle this issue:

  1. Install Restrictors:Adding oil restrictors can regulate the flow of oil to the top end. By limiting the volume, they prevent excess oil, reducing the risk of over-oiling.
  2. Upgrade to a High-Quality Oil Pump:Consider switching to a high-performance oil pump. Brands like Melling offer pumps with adjustable pressure features, ensuring that the right amount of oil reaches the cylinder heads.
  3. Ensure Proper Drainage:Inspect and clean the oil return passages in the heads. Blocked passages can cause oil to accumulate, so using a small brush or compressed air can help keep them clear.
  4. Gasket and Seal Replacement:Worn out gaskets or seals can contribute to improper oil flow. Regularly check these components and replace them with high-quality alternatives to maintain optimal oil management.
  5. Valve Cover Breathers:Installing valve cover breathers can help vent excess pressure from the engine, aiding in reducing oil seepage through the valve guides.
  6. Adjust Oil Viscosity:Sometimes, using an oil with a slightly higher viscosity can reduce excessive oil movement at higher RPMs.

By following these steps, you can significantly minimize over-oiling issues in Oldsmobile cylinder heads, leading to improved engine performance and longevity.

 

What challenges exist in finding parts for Oldsmobile diesel injectors, and how can they be addressed?

Challenges in Procuring Oldsmobile Diesel Injectors

Finding replacement parts for Oldsmobile diesel injectors can be quite a task for vintage car enthusiasts and mechanics. The primary challenge lies in their obsolete status, which means these parts are no longer in production and readily available in the market. Here are the main difficulties faced:

  1. Scarcity of Parts: As these injectors are now considered obsolete, locating any leftover stock is increasingly difficult. Without new parts being manufactured, sourcing becomes an issue of finding rare, existing inventory.
  2. Quality Concerns: Even if parts are found, they may not meet quality standards. Testing often reveals performance issues, such as inadequate pressure levels or poor spray patterns, which are vital for efficient injector function.
Addressing the Challenges

To navigate these hurdles, here are some strategies:

  • Consult Specialist Suppliers: Engaging with suppliers who specialize in obsolete or classic car parts may be beneficial. They often have networks or stock that isn’t visible on mainstream platforms.
  • Upgrade Strategies: Another approach is to modify existing injectors through skilled refurbishment. This involves technicians reviewing the parts for potential improvements, enhancing their performance even in the absence of new alternatives.
  • Custom Fabrication: In some cases, custom fabrication might be a viable solution. This involves creating new parts based on the specifications of the old ones using modern technology, albeit at a higher cost.

By exploring these solutions, owners and mechanics can continue to maintain the functionality and performance of classic Oldsmobile diesel vehicles despite the scarcity of original parts.

 

Where can Oldsmobile diesel engine parts be sourced from salvage yards?

Sourcing Oldsmobile Diesel Engine Parts from Salvage Yards

Finding Oldsmobile diesel engine parts in salvage yards requires a bit of strategy and persistence. With the right resources, though, you can successfully locate the components you need.

Begin by exploring online databases that aggregate salvage yard inventories. Car-Part.com is a reliable resource where you can browse extensive listings of available parts across various locations. This platform is particularly useful for pinpointing nearby yards with the specific Oldsmobile diesel parts you’re seeking.

Local Salvage Yards

In addition to online searches, visiting salvage yards in person can be fruitful. Notable areas such as Fort Worthand Dallas, Texas have been known to house Oldsmobile diesel engines, along with other brands. These locations often feature a variety of vehicle models, enhancing your chance of finding suitable parts.

Tips for Successful Sourcing
  • Check Inventory Regularly: Salvage yard inventories can change frequently, so it’s wise to check back often or call ahead.
  • Networking: Building relationships with salvage yard staff can offer insights into when new parts may become available.
  • Inspect Carefully: Be prepared to evaluate parts in person; bring any necessary tools to assess their condition.
Exploring Secondary Options

If immediate online or local searches don’t yield results, consider lurking on platforms like Craigslist for individuals selling parts. Despite the occasional lack of response, it’s a cost-effective option for sourcing rare components.

By combining these approaches, you’ll improve your chances of obtaining the Oldsmobile diesel engine parts you need from salvage yards.

 

What are the differences between flat tappet and roller camshafts in the Oldsmobile diesel engine?

Understanding Flat Tappet vs. Roller Camshafts in Oldsmobile Diesel Engines

When examining camshafts in Oldsmobile diesel engines, especially from around the late ’70s to early ’80s, it’s important to distinguish between flat tappet and roller camshafts. These components play a crucial role in engine performance. Here’s a breakdown of their differences.

Flat Tappet Camshafts

Flat tappet camshafts, prevalent in the 1978-1979 Oldsmobile diesel engines, are characterized by:

  • Lifter Compatibility: Designed for flat tappet lifters, offering a straightforward and relatively cost-effective design.
  • Intake and Exhaust Timing:
    • Intake: Opens at 15 degrees ATDC and closes at 6 degrees ABDC, totaling a duration of 171 degrees with a lift of .230 inches.
    • Exhaust: Opens at 29 degrees BBDC and closes at 17 degrees BTDC, with a 192-degree duration and a lift of .233 inches.

This setup typically provides a solid performance for everyday driving conditions, although it might be more prone to wear over time due to the nature of the contact between the lifter and the camshaft.

Roller Camshafts

Introduced in the 1980s, roller camshafts offer several advancements over their flat tappet counterparts:

  • Lifter Compatibility: Although designed for a larger .921″ lifter originally, these were fitted with .842″ lifters in practice. The larger lifter is theorized to slightly increase the duration.
  • Intake and Exhaust Timing:
    • Intake: Opens at 14 degrees ATDC and closes at 31 degrees BBDC, resulting in a duration of 165 degrees with a lift of .250 inches.
    • Exhaust: Opens at 31 degrees BBDC and closes at 17 degrees BTDC, featuring a 194-degree duration and a lift of .277 inches.

Roller camshafts typically offer reduced friction and improved timing accuracy, leading to potentially enhanced performance and fuel efficiency. The roller mechanism allows for greater lift without increasing wear, making it a preferred choice for power and longevity.

Key Differences
  1. Design and Wear: Roller camshafts tend to have longer lifespans due to reduced friction, whereas flat tappets may wear out faster.
  2. Performance: Roller cams allow for higher lifts and better engine performance, especially noticeable at higher RPMs.
  3. Maintenance: Flat tappet systems might require more frequent maintenance checks to prevent wear-related issues.

In summary, while both camshafts serve the essential function of controlling valves, the choice between flat tappet and roller camshafts heavily depends on one’s performance goals and maintenance willingness.

 

What are the options for sourcing new or used parts for the Oldsmobile 350 diesel engine?

When sourcing parts for the Oldsmobile 350 diesel engine, your first stop should be a salvage yard, where you might uncover some hidden gems. Websites like Car-Part serve as valuable resources for finding used components scattered across various salvage yards. These platforms can help locate specific parts, sometimes even within different regions, like Texas.

For those looking to obtain injectors or injector pumps, keep an eye on online marketplaces such as Craigslist. Although it might take some time to establish contact, this approach can lead to rare finds that aren’t readily available through other channels.

Adjusting and Modifying Parts
  • Injector Adjustment: The pop-pressure in IDI injectors is adjustable using shims. If you’re in need of specific sizes, check with local service shops that may offer custom shimming services.
  • Transmission Components: If your setup involves a manual transmission, retaining components like the Vacuum Regulator Valve from an automatic setup can be beneficial, as these parts are often highly valued.
New Part Options

If you prefer new parts, explore aftermarket vendors that specialize in diesel engines. While these might be more expensive than used parts, they offer reliability and often come with warranties.

By utilizing a combination of salvage yard finds, online resources, and specialized shops, you can efficiently source both new and used parts for your Oldsmobile 350 diesel engine.

 

What issues do Oldsmobile 350 diesel engines commonly face, such as head gasket problems?

One of the biggest problems with the 350 diesels was water in the fuel ruining the injection pump and injectors. The 4.3L was protected with a water separator as well as a better fuel filter.

Another major problem for the 350 were the weak torque-to-yield (TTY) head bolts and too few of them. The 4.3L still used TTY bolts (albeit better ones) but had six bolts per cylinder rather than four.

Many Oldsmobile diesels also faced head gasket sealing problems. A fix for this is using high-strength ARP bolts or studs for greater clamping force. However, it’s important to note that unless your engine block was machined with ARP components already in place, this solution might not be viable.

Other 350 issues, including main cap bolts that were too short and an improperly balanced crankshaft, were rookie problems not repeated by the 4.3’s engineers.

Overall, while the 4.3L improved upon many of the 350’s design flaws, understanding these specific issues can help in maintaining or restoring these engines effectively.

 

Why is a water separator important for the Oldsmobile 350 diesel engine, and what issues can arise without it?

One of the biggest problems with the 350 diesels was water in the fuel ruining the injection pump and injectors. The absence of a water separator from the factory setup led directly to these premature engine failures. Unlike its predecessor, the 4.3L was protected with a water separator as well as a better fuel filter, highlighting the importance of this component in maintaining engine health.

Another major problem for the 350 were the weak torque-to-yield (TTY) head bolts and too few of them. The 4.3L still used TTY bolts (albeit better ones) but had six bolts per cylinder rather than four, providing a more robust structure.

Other 350 issues included:

  • Main cap bolts that were too short
  • An improperly balanced crankshaft

These were rookie problems not repeated by the 4.3’s engineers. By learning from past mistakes, the design improvements in the 4.3L model addressed these vulnerabilities, emphasizing the critical role of components like the water separator in engine longevity.


 

You May Also Like

Cuba by Diesel

OIL BURNERS RUNNING STRONG ON THE ISLAND PARADISE Hola from Cuba! Cross off another bucket list destination and pass the cerveza. In spite of Castro […]
DW  VW

Volkswagen Golf TDI: Nimble, Fun, and Efficient with the EA288 2.0L TDI Engine

The Volkswagen Golf first came to the U.S. in 1974 and was marketed as the Rabbit. This fun little car was the first, or Mark […]
DW  MBZ

Tested: Mercedes-Benz E250 Diesel

Besting Highway MPG In A Luxury Diesel Sedan Recently, we were able to get behind the wheel of a 2015 Mercedes-Benz E250 and do some […]