TRACTOR TALK

1962 FORD 2000

The early 1960s brought a lot of changes to the worldwide Ford ag equipment manufacturing empire. Ford announced a new organization, Ford Tractor Operations, in March of 1961. The goal was to consolidate all of global Ford’s ag manufacturing into one organization, under one name. As a result the British Fordson name would disappear and new tractors would follow a standardized pattern and identity worldwide under the Ford banner. The operation would culminate in 1964 with a new line of worldwide tractors, finally replacing the unique American Ford and British Fordson designs. England would build the small tractors for all markets and the U.S. operation would build the bigger stuff, again for all markets.

The Fordson organization in Britain had been a vital part of the Ford ag empire almost from it’s 1917 inception. The core of Fordson would become an equally vital part of Ford tractor operations after the name was retired. Between the advent of Ford Tractor Operations and the new Worldwide Tractors, the operation would rebadge Fordson tractors and gradually push away from the Fordson identity. Case in point, the 1962 Ford 2000 Super Dexta highlighted in this story.

The Ford 2000 Super Dexta debuted in the U.S.A. for 1962 as a renamed Fordson Super Dexta, an evolution of the 1957-61 Fordson Dexta. That was strange because there was also an American-built Ford 2000 four-cylinder tractor (gas or diesel) for 1962 which replaced the Workmaster 501, 601 and 701 series tractors. The American unit was a completely different tractor than the Super Dexta 2000, sharing only the same blue and Gray paint and the “Ford 2000” decal. Well, I guess we could call it a moment of schizophrenia before the big consolidation.

Like the earlier Dexta, the Super Dexta had a diesel that was a bit of a hybrid. Story goes that when the Dexta was being developed in the mid-’50s, Perkins offered Fordson the P3 (a.k.a. P3.144, 25 hp at the flywheel), which was already a well established powerplant. Fordson declined directly but once some design changes were agreed upon, they jointly manufactured the engines. The major castings were done at the Fordson plant in Dagenham, then shipped to Perkins for final machining and assembly. Whether the early 144 ci or the later 152 ci, the engine was known by Perkins as the “F3”, “F” for “Ford, replacing the normal “P” for “Perkins,” followed by the displacement (either 144 or 152). Reportedly, the 152 F3 three-cylinder hung on with Perkins until at least 2002. Ford three-cylinders evolved into an oversquare design (Ford always loves oversquare engines!), a similar one being a 158 ci triple that powered the smallest Ford Worldwide tractors for many years.

We covered the Ford Dexta in the February 2012 issue. The Super Dexta/Ford 2000 version differed in having revised sheet metal and colors (Blue/Gray vs Blue/Orange), a larger, more powerful and revised 3-cylinder engine (39 PTO hp vs 31) and a diff lock. Both versions of the Dexta were exceedingly good small tractors with a long list of satisfied customers. Their DNA lived on for many years in the Worldwide tractors built in the Dagenham, England, Ford tractor plant.

---

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS

What is the advantage of the later Dexta models in terms of gear speed?

The primary benefit of newer Dexta models lies in their improved gear system. These models feature a significantly slower low gear compared to previous versions. This adjustment makes them particularly suitable for tasks that require precision, such as operating a rototiller, where controlling speed is crucial for effective results. By offering a slower low gear, these tractors provide enhanced versatility and efficiency for a range of agricultural activities.

 

How does the Super Dexta 2000’s performance compare to a 2000 4-cylinder gas tractor?

When comparing the Super Dexta 2000 to a 2000 4-cylinder gas tractor, the Super Dexta 2000 stands out for its superior performance and efficiency. The Super Dexta 2000 is known for working more efficiently over an extended period, outperforming the 4-cylinder gas counterpart.

Performance Highlights:

• Endurance and Efficiency: The Super Dexta 2000 is designed to handle long hours of operation with minimal downtime, making it a more reliable choice for demanding tasks.
• Power Comparison: While the 4-cylinder gas engine delivers a steady performance, the Super Dexta 2000tends to provide more consistent power, especially under heavy loads.
• Fuel Economy: Diesel engines like that in the Super Dexta 2000 often offer better fuel efficiency compared to gas engines, which can translate into long-term savings and less frequent refueling.

In summary, the Super Dexta 2000 is likely to deliver better overall performance, especially in terms of long-haul strength and efficiency, making it a preferable option in many scenarios.

 

What would be a fair price for a Super Dexta that needs tires and possibly other repairs?

Evaluating the Fair Price for a Super Dexta in Need of Repairs

Determining a fair price for a Super Dexta that requires new tires and possibly other repairs involves a few considerations. Here’s a comprehensive breakdown to guide your decision:

1. Condition Assessment:
   • Non-Running: If the tractor doesn’t start, you can expect its value to range from $300 to $500. This takes into account the potential engine or mechanical issues that may need attention.
   • Running Condition: If the tractor starts and operates smoothly, its initial value increases significantly, contingent upon additional factors like tire condition and overall maintenance.
2. Tire Evaluation:
   • Requires New Tires: Should new tires be necessary, and if the tractor is fully operational otherwise, a fair offer might cap around $1,000. This estimate presumes spending on tire replacements and possibly other small repairs.
   • Usable Tires: If the tires are functional—meaning they hold air, are not dry-rotted, and have decent tread—the tractor’s worth increases to approximately $2,500, assuming no major underlying issues exist.
3. Final Consideration:
   • Be sure to perform a thorough inspection beyond the surface to identify any hidden repairs that might be necessary. The operational soundness of the engine, hydromechanical components, and electrical systems should not be overlooked.

By assessing these factors, you’ll be well-equipped to make an informed purchasing decision. This approach ensures you’re investing in a tractor at a price that reflects both its current state and the necessary repairs to restore it fully.

 

Are parts for the Super Dexta 2000 expensive and hard to find in the US?

Yes, parts for the Super Dexta 2000 can be both costly and difficult to locate in the United States. This tractor features a 3-cylinder Perkins diesel engine, which differs from the Ford engines produced after 1965. Due to its limited distribution primarily within the UK and various European regions, finding replacement parts in the USposes a significant challenge.

You might find yourself needing comprehensive replacements such as a complete set of tires, seals, and potentially other components. These parts are not only hard to find but may come at a high price, emphasizing the need to source them from specialized suppliers or import them from abroad.

 

How is the low gear in these tractors described in terms of usability?

In later Dexta models, the low gear is notably slower, making it suitable for tasks like using a rototiller, whereas in general, the low gear is often considered too fast for such applications.

 

How did the design of the 2000 series change after 1964?

After 1964, the 2000 series underwent a complete redesign, becoming a more cost-effective version of the 3000 series.

 

How were the earlier North American 2000 diesels related to the Dexta?

The earlier North American 2000 diesels were essentially rebranded versions of the Dexta, indicating that they were the same tractors with different labels.

 

What are the performance characteristics and limitations of the Super Dexta?

The engine was a mix of design features from Fordson and Perkins. It was a three-cylinder with dry sleeves, four main bearings, and a 3.6 x 5.0 inch bore and stroke, making 152 cubic inches. The bore was 0.100-in. Larger than the 144 ci Dexta. Flywheel power of the Super Dexta was 43, but grew to 45 in just a couple of years. Most of the extra power is derived from the extra displacement plus spinning the engine up from 2000 to 2250 rpm. Both variations used a Simms inline pump, but the Super Dexta was mechanically governed versus hydraulically. A glow system was used and the Super Dexta was a reasonably good cold-starter.

Performance and Usability

The Super Dexta is noted for its nimbleness and high horsepower, making it a formidable choice for a variety of tasks. In practice, it competes effectively with models like the 2000 4-cylinder gas burner, showcasing robust performance throughout the day. Though slightly lighter, it can perform much like the 3000 model, offering reliability and efficiency.

Limitations

Despite its strengths, the Super Dexta has some limitations. It lacks power steering, which can affect maneuverability for some users. Additionally, sourcing parts can be challenging as they are primarily available in England. These factors should be considered by potential buyers looking for ease of maintenance and operation.

Overall, the Super Dexta combines a well-engineered engine with practical performance characteristics, making it a valuable asset for those needing a dependable tractor with a balance of power and agility.

 

What is the overall user experience with the Super Dexta?

Users generally find the Super Dexta reliable and effective for extended use, describing it as a very good tractor that can handle demanding tasks throughout the day without significant issues.

 

What are the limitations or drawbacks of using the Super Dexta?

The main limitations include the absence of power steering and the challenge of sourcing parts, as they are predominantly available in England, which can complicate maintenance and repairs.

 

What are the practical performance attributes of the Super Dexta?

The Super Dexta is known for being agile and delivering high horsepower. Despite being lightweight, it remains highly functional and efficient for various tasks.

 

How does the Super Dexta compare to other tractor models in terms of performance?

The Super Dexta can outperform the 2000 4-cylinder gas model consistently and is likely on par with the 2000 3-cylinder diesel in terms of strength. Its capabilities suggest it operates similarly to the more robust 3000 model.

 

What type of engine does the Super Dexta have?

The Super Dexta is equipped with a 3-cylinder Perkins diesel engine, which is distinct from the 3-cylinder engines introduced by Ford in 1965 and later.

 

What are the differences between the Dexta and Super Dexta engines compared to Perkins engines?

The engine was a mix of design features from Fordson and Perkins. It was a three-cylinder with dry sleeves, four main bearings, and a 3.6 x 5.0 inch bore and stroke, making 152 cubic inches. The bore was 0.100-in. Larger than the 144 ci Dexta. Flywheel power of the Super Dexta was 43, but grew to 45 in just a couple of years. Most of the extra power is derived from the extra displacement plus spinning the engine up from 2000 to 2250 rpm. Both variations used a Simms inline pump but the Super Dexta was mechanically governed versus hydraulically. A glow system was used and the Super Dexta was a reasonably good cold-starter.

Like the earlier Dexta, the Super Dexta had a diesel that was a bit of a hybrid. Story goes that when the Dexta was being developed in the mid-’50s, Perkins offered Fordson the P3 (a.k.a. P3.144, 25 hp at the flywheel), which was already a well-established powerplant. Fordson declined directly but once some design changes were agreed upon, they jointly manufactured the engines. The major castings were done at the Fordson plant in Dagenham, then shipped to Perkins for final machining and assembly. Whether the early 144 ci or the later 152 ci, the engine was known by Perkins as the “F3”, “F” for “Ford,” replacing the normal “P” for “Perkins,” followed by the displacement (either 144 or 152). Reportedly, the 152 F3 three-cylinder hung on with Perkins until at least 2002. Ford three-cylinders evolved into an oversquare design (Ford always loves oversquare engines!), a similar one being a 158 ci triple that powered the smallest Ford Worldwide tractors for many years.

Key Differences from Perkins Engines

The Dexta and Super Dexta engines, while assembled by Perkins, were fundamentally Ford F3 units. This distinction is crucial as it underlines that these engines were not pure Perkins creations, but rather a collaborative effort with specific differences:

• Parts Compatibility: Though visually similar, many components are not interchangeable with Perkinsengines. Key differences include the injectors and injection pump, which are distinct from those used in Massey Ferguson models.
• Oil Pump and Liners: The oil pump differs from standard Perkins models, although a Perkins pump can be adapted to fit. The engine liners require pressing in and subsequent reboring, unlike the MF liners with a ridge that necessitates counter-boring of the block.
• Engine Blocks: The blocks of these engines are unique. Using an MF block involves additional modifications, such as plugging several unused holes.

These specific engineering differences highlight the unique identity of the Dexta and Super Dexta engines, despite their assembly origins with Perkins, showcasing a blend of innovation and adaptation in their design.

 

Where can I find the engine serial number and date code on a Ford 2000 series tractor to verify its age?

Locating the Engine Serial Number and Date Code on a Ford 2000 Series Tractor

To verify the age of your Ford 2000 series tractor, it’s essential to locate the engine serial number and date code. Here’s how you can find it:

1. Inspect the Right Side of the Engine Block
   Begin by checking the right side of your engine block. You should focus on the lower part, just above where the oil pan is situated.
2. Identify the Flat Rail
   Look for a smooth, flat rail running the length of the block. This rail stretches from the front to the back of the engine.
3. Locate the Taller Section
   As you examine the rail, you’ll notice a taller section positioned around the middle. This is your key area of interest.
4. Find the Stamps
   The engine serial number and the date code are stamped into this taller section. These numbers are critical for determining the assembly date and verifying the tractor’s age.

By following these steps, you’ll easily locate the necessary details to verify your tractor’s history and age.

 

How can I determine the manufacturing year of my Ford 2000 series tractor using the serial number?

To determine the manufacturing year of your 2000 series tractor using the serial number, you’ll need to examine a few key details. Begin by locating the serial number, which typically starts with a letter followed by a series of numbers. This letter indicates the assembly plant where your tractor was built. For example, an ‘A’ at the beginning signifies that it was produced in Antwerp, Belgium.

While European serial numbers often lack comprehensive documentation, you can still make an educated estimate regarding the manufacturing year. Pay special attention to the number and any accompanying codes, as they can offer valuable insights.

1. Identify the Unit Number Code:This code is crucial because it reveals the exact date of assembly. The format typically involves a combination of numbers and letters.
2. Decode the Assembly Date:Manufacturers usually encode the day, month, and year of assembly. For instance, a code like ‘5M31B’ tells you the tractor was assembled on December 31, 1965, during the day shift.

By decoding these elements, you can accurately determine the manufacturing year of your tractor.

 

How should I interpret the Unit Number code on my Ford 2000 series tractor?

How to Decode the Unit Number on Your Tractor

Understanding the Unit Number on your tractor can provide you with valuable information about its assembly date. This code is a timestamp, revealing both the date and the shift during which your tractor was put together. Here’s how to interpret it:

1. Breaking Down the Code: The initial part of the Unit Number represents a sequence of digits and letters. Each segment communicates specific details:
   • Day and Month: The first segment of the code usually indicates the day and month of production.
   • Year of Manufacture: A subsequent letter often signals the year your tractor was assembled.
   • Shift Detail: The concluding character points to whether your tractor was built during the day or night shift.
2. Example Interpretation:
   • If your Unit Number reads “5M31B,” let’s break it down:
     • 5stands for the day of the month.
     • Mis a code for the month, say December.
     • 31corresponds to the 31st.
     • Bidentifies the production shift, often indicating a day shift.

3. Consult Manufacturer Guides: For more specific interpretations, you might want to refer to manufacturer guidelines or forums known for tractor expertise.

By dissecting the Unit Number in this way, you gain insights into precisely when your tractor rolled off the assembly line. Understanding this can deepen your appreciation for its history and possibly aid in restoration or part replacement efforts.

 

What does the letter “A” signify in the serial number of a Ford 2000 series tractor?

The letter “A” at the start of the serial number on a Ford 2000 series tractor indicates its manufacturing origin. Specifically, it signifies that this tractor was assembled at the plant located in Antwerp, Belgium.

 

What modifications or considerations are there when using parts from other models or brands on the Super Dexta 2000 tractor?

When considering parts from other models or brands for the Super Dexta 2000 tractor, there are essential modifications and considerations to keep in mind. The engine is not a direct match with common alternatives, such as Perkins. While some components might resemble Perkins parts, they aren’t directly interchangeable due to unique specifications.

Key Modifications and Considerations:

• Injectors and Injection Pump: These components differ from other models like Massey Ferguson (MF). Direct replacements won’t fit without adjustments.
• Oil Pump: Although the original differs, you can fit a Perkins oil pump with some modifications.
• Cylinder Liners: The liners present a particular challenge. On a Ford, they must be pressed in and then rebored. Alternatively, MF liners can fit, but the engine block requires counter-boring to accommodate their top ridge.
• Engine Blocks: If you attempt to swap in a block from another brand, such as MF, be prepared for additional work. You’ll need to plug several unused holes due to design differences.

Keep these factors in mind to ensure compatibility and maintain engine performance when using parts not originally designed for the Super Dexta 2000.

 

What are the advantages of the later models of the Super Dexta, particularly in terms of gear performance?

What is the advantage of the later Dexta models in terms of gear speed?

The primary benefit of newer Dexta models lies in their improved gear system. These models feature a significantly slower low gear compared to previous versions. This adjustment makes them particularly suitable for tasks that require precision, such as operating a rototiller, where controlling speed is crucial for effective results. By offering a slower low gear, these tractors provide enhanced versatility and efficiency for a range of agricultural activities.

The main advantage of these later models is that the low gear is much slower than the other gears available. This specific improvement in gear performance allows for practical application with equipment like rototillers, where a slower pace is necessary to ensure thorough and even tilling. This feature not only enhances the tractor’s adaptability but also improves the overall effectiveness when engaging in tasks that demand careful maneuvering and control.

 

Why is the slower low gear in later Dexta models beneficial for certain applications?

The slower low gear makes these models particularly practical for use with equipment like a rototiller, where controlling speed is essential for effective operation.

 

How does the low gear in later Dexta models compare to the other gears in terms of speed?

In later Dexta models, the low gear is significantly slower compared to the other gears, providing better control for precise tasks.

 

What are the main characteristics and features of the Super Dexta 2000 tractor?

The engine was a mix of design features from Fordson and Perkins. It was a three-cylinder with dry sleeves, four main bearings, and a 3.6 x 5.0 inch bore and stroke, making 152 cubic inches. The bore was 0.100 inches larger than the 144 cubic inch Dexta. Flywheel power of the Super Dexta was 43, but grew to 45 in just a couple of years. Most of the extra power is derived from the extra displacement plus spinning the engine up from 2000 to 2250 rpm. Both variations used a Simms inline pump, but the Super Dexta was mechanically governed versus hydraulically. A glow system was used, and the Super Dexta was a reasonably good cold-starter.

The Super Dexta is noted for its nimbleness and high horsepower, making it a formidable choice for a variety of tasks. In practice, it competes effectively with models like the 2000 4-cylinder gas burner, showcasing robust performance throughout the day. Though slightly lighter, it can perform much like the 3000 model, offering reliability and efficiency.

Key Characteristics and Comparisons

• Engine Performance: The Super Dexta’s 3-cylinder diesel engine is distinct from the later Ford engines, known for its impressive performance, especially when contrasted with the 2000 3-cylinder diesel. While the exact comparison with the 2000 diesel remains speculative, the Super Dexta is often likened to the 3000 model in terms of strength and horsepower.
• Horsepower and Displacement: With a Nebraska Test #844 rating of 38.8 PTO horsepower, closely matching the 3000 diesel’s 39.2, the Super Dexta offers competitive power. Its engine displacement of 153 cubic inches surpasses the older Dexta’s 144, contributing to its enhanced performance.
• Operational RPM: The engine’s capability to run at 2250 RPM, compared to the Dexta’s 2000, gives it an edge in power generation and operational efficiency.

Limitations and Parts Availability

Despite its strengths, the Super Dexta has some limitations. It lacks power steering, which can affect maneuverability for some users. Additionally, sourcing parts can be challenging as they are primarily available in England. These factors should be considered by potential buyers looking for ease of maintenance and operation.

Overall, the Super Dexta combines a well-engineered engine with practical performance characteristics, making it a valuable asset for those needing a dependable tractor with a balance of power and agility. It remains a robust choice for those willing to navigate the challenges of sourcing parts, offering a rewarding experience for its users.

 

What are the general performance characteristics of the Super Dexta?

The Super Dexta is known for being nimble and powerful, capable of performing tasks efficiently, much like the 3000 model, though it lacks power steering.

 

How does the Super Dexta’s engine RPM and displacement compare to the older Dexta model?

The Super Dexta’s engine runs at 2250 RPM, compared to 2000 RPM for the older Dexta, and has a displacement of 153 cubic inches versus the older model’s 144 cubic inches.

 

What are the specific performance metrics of the Super Dexta’s engine compared to the 3000 diesel?

The Super Dexta was tested to have 38.8 PTO horsepower, closely matching the 3000 diesel, which has 39.2 PTO horsepower.

 

What is the availability of parts for the Super Dexta in the US?

Parts for the Super Dexta are difficult to find in the US, as they were primarily sold in the UK and Europe. Most parts would need to be sourced from England.

 

How does the Super Dexta compare to other tractor models like the 2000 4-cylinder gas burner and the 3000 diesel?

The Super Dexta outperforms the 2000 4-cylinder gas burner with ease throughout the day and offers performance similar to the 3000 diesel, despite being slightly lighter.

 

How does the Super Dexta 2000 perform in terms of fuel efficiency and operating costs?

“When comparing the Super Dexta 2000 to a 2000 4-cylinder gas tractor, the Super Dexta 2000 stands out for its superior performance and efficiency. The Super Dexta 2000 is known for working more efficiently over an extended period, outperforming the 4-cylinder gas counterpart.

Performance Highlights:

• Endurance and Efficiency:The Super Dexta 2000 is designed to handle long hours of operation with minimal downtime, making it a more reliable choice for demanding tasks. In fact, its predecessor, with a slightly smaller engine, could pull a set of two bottom plows for over ten hours on just a seven-gallon tank. This example showcases the remarkable fuel efficiency that continues to be a hallmark of the Super Dexta series.
• Power Comparison:While the 4-cylinder gas engine delivers a steady performance, the Super Dexta 2000tends to provide more consistent power, especially under heavy loads. This reliability is crucial when working with challenging agricultural tasks.
• Fuel Economy:Diesel engines like that in the Super Dexta 2000 often offer better fuel efficiency compared to gas engines, which can translate into long-term savings and less frequent refueling. The ability to operate efficiently for extended periods without needing frequent stops for fuel is a significant advantage for operators focused on minimizing operating costs.

In summary, the Super Dexta 2000 is likely to deliver better overall performance, especially in terms of long-haul strength and efficiency, making it a preferable option in many scenarios. Its impressive fuel economy and low operating costs make it a wise choice for those seeking both power and efficiency in their agricultural machinery.”

 

What is the value of a Super Dexta 2000 tractor found in a barn?

What is the condition and value of a barn find Super Dexta 2000 tractor?

The Super Dexta 2000 tractor, discovered in a barn, has mostly retained its original parts and components, including the paint, which remains in good condition. However, the tires are completely flat, likely due to the tractor being stationary for several years. It comes with a 7-foot Tufline disc attached to it, which might add value if in usable condition. Overall, while the body and paint appear well-preserved, the tractor will require some work, especially with the tires, to restore it to full functionality.

When evaluating the value of this barn find, several factors come into play:

• Non-Running Condition: If the tractor doesn’t start, its worth typically ranges between $300 and $500. This assessment takes into account the need for significant repairs just to get the engine running again.
• Tire Condition: Tires are a critical component. If they are dry-rotted or flat, replacing them could be necessary. If new tires are required, consider a top offer of around $1000, assuming everything else is in good condition.
• Running Condition with Usable Tires: Should the tractor run and the tires hold air without showing signs of severe wear, the value could increase significantly, potentially reaching around $2500.

These estimates provide a practical framework for understanding the tractor’s market value based on its current state. By addressing both the physical condition and potential running status, you can make an informed decision on whether this vintage find is worth the investment.

 

Is hearing the tractor run a condition for offering a higher price?

Yes, hearing the tractor run is essential to justify a higher offer, especially if considering a price near $1000 or more.

 

How does the condition of the tires affect the value?

The condition of the tires significantly impacts the tractor’s value, as needing replacements can lower the offer price, while good tires can enhance it.

 

What is the value of the tractor if it is running and the tires are in good condition?

Assuming the tractor is running and the tires are in decent shape, it could be valued at approximately $2500.

 

What is the maximum offer if the tractor needs new tires but appears otherwise in good condition?

The highest offer would likely be around $1000 if the tractor requires new tires but is otherwise in good shape.

 

What is the value range of the tractor if it is not running?

If the tractor is not operational, its estimated value falls between $300 and $500.

 

How does the performance of the Super Dexta 2000 compare to the Ford 3000 tractor?

The Super Dexta can outperform the 2000 4-cylinder gas model consistently and is likely on par with the 2000 3-cylinder diesel in terms of strength. Its capabilities suggest it operates similarly to the more robust 3000 model.

When considering the Super Dexta’s power, it’s essential to note the impressive 3-cylinder Perkins engine. This engine, shared with the MF 35 and 135 tractors, is renowned for its durability and efficiency, often hailed as one of the best ever built. This reputation underpins the Super Dexta’s performance credentials.

Additionally, the Super Dexta 2000’s performance is comparable to the Ford 3000. Both models exhibit similar strength and reliability, making the Super Dexta a formidable contender in its class. These comparisons underscore the Super Dexta’s capability and enduring legacy in the field, marking it as a tractor that stands the test of time.

 

Is the Super Dexta 2000 comparable to the Ford 3000 in performance?

Yes, the Super Dexta 2000 is considered to offer performance comparable to that of the Ford 3000 model.

 

What is the reputation of the engine used in the Super Dexta?

The engine is frequently praised as one of the best ever manufactured, according to many enthusiasts and experts.

 

How does the engine of the Super Dexta compare to other well-known tractors?

The Super Dexta’s 3-cylinder Perkins engine shares similarities with the engines in the MF 35 and 135 models, having the same cubic inch capacity.

 

What was the reputation of the Super Dexta during its time?

The Super Dexta was highly regarded and considered a standout tractor in its era.

 

How common are Super Dexta tractors in different regions (e.g., the UK, southern US)?

Regional Availability of Super Dexta Tractors

The prevalence of Super Dexta tractors varies significantly depending on the region. In the United Kingdom and across much of Europe, these tractors were widely distributed and have remained a common sight on local farms, thanks in part to steady parts availability and a long-standing reputation for durability.

In contrast, the picture in the United States is more nuanced. For example, in areas such as the rural South—especially places like Alabama—Super Dextas are surprisingly abundant. Many of these tractors were sold in the early 1960s, and it’s not uncommon to see them still in operation today. In some small towns, they’re as ubiquitous as classic Ford 8N and 9N models, making them a staple of the local agricultural landscape.

However, outside these select regions, especially as you move further from agricultural hubs, Super Dextas become far less common. The limited original importation and the challenge of sourcing replacement parts mean they’re rarer in other parts of the US, particularly in the Midwest and West. While you might encounter the occasional Super Dexta at a vintage tractor show or tucked away in a private collection, their population density is nothing like what’s found in parts of Europe or the southern states.

Collectors and enthusiasts in North America might need to rely on dedicated importers or specialized dealers to find a Super Dexta in good condition or to keep an existing one up and running. This disparity in distribution highlights just how region-specific the Super Dexta’s legacy can be.

 

What is the impact of model variations (such as early North American 2000 diesels vs. Post-1964 models) on performance and value?

How did the design of the 2000 series change after 1964?

After 1964, the 2000 series underwent a complete redesign, becoming a more cost-effective version of the 3000 series. This redesign marked a significant break from the earlier models, which had been closely tied to the Dexta in terms of engineering and features.

How were the earlier North American 2000 diesels related to the Dexta?

The earlier North American 2000 diesels were essentially rebranded versions of the Dexta, indicating that they were the same tractors with different labels. If you’re looking at a pre-1964 2000 diesel, you’re really dealing with a Dextaunder a new name.

How did these changes affect usability, especially low gear operation?

One notable advantage in the later Dexta models was the much slower low gear compared to earlier versions. This improvement made tasks like running a rototiller far more practical, as the tractor could move at a pace better suited to soil work. However, in general, low gear on many models (especially the earlier ones) was often considered too fast for such applications. This is an important consideration if you plan to use implements that require a particularly slow ground speed.

By understanding these distinctions, you’ll be better equipped to match a specific 2000 series tractor to your intended use, especially if tasks like tilling or precision work are a priority.

 

What is the history and background of the Super Dexta 2000, including its production years and any design changes?

Key Differences from Perkins Engines

The Dexta and Super Dexta engines, while assembled by Perkins, were fundamentally Ford F3 units. This distinction is crucial as it underlines that these engines were not pure Perkins creations, but rather a collaborative effort with specific differences:

• Parts Compatibility: Though visually similar, many components are not interchangeable with Perkinsengines. Key differences include the injectors and injection pump, which are distinct from those used in Massey Ferguson models.
• Oil Pump and Liners: The oil pump differs from standard Perkins models, although a Perkins pump can be adapted to fit. The engine liners require pressing in and subsequent reboring, unlike the MF liners with a ridge that necessitates counter-boring of the block.
• Engine Blocks: The blocks of these engines are unique. Using an MF block involves additional modifications, such as plugging several unused holes.

These specific engineering differences highlight the unique identity of the Dexta and Super Dexta engines, despite their assembly origins with Perkins, showcasing a blend of innovation and adaptation in their design.

Clarifying the Ford F3 and Perkins Relationship

While some confusion lingers around the origins of these engines, it’s clear that the Dexta and Super Dexta were not simply Perkins P3s repainted blue. The main castings were produced at Fordson’s Dagenham plant and assembled by Perkins, resulting in engines marked “F3” — the “F” for Ford — rather than the usual “P” for Perkins. Though certain parts may look similar to those in the Massey Ferguson lineup, subtle engineering differences set them apart. For example, injection equipment and liners are specific to these Fordson-Perkins collaborations. Reports suggest that later on, Perkins did acquire the design and tooling after Ford exited production, but blocks still bear the distinctive EnFo (English Ford) casting.

Key Characteristics and Features of the Super Dexta 2000 Tractor

The engine was a mix of design features from Fordson and Perkins. It was a three-cylinder with dry sleeves, four main bearings, and a 3.6 x 5.0 inch bore and stroke, making 152 cubic inches. The bore was 0.100 inches larger than the 144 cubic inch Dexta. Flywheel power of the Super Dexta was 43, but grew to 45 in just a couple of years. Most of the extra power is derived from the extra displacement plus spinning the engine up from 2000 to 2250 rpm. Both variations used a Simms inline pump, but the Super Dexta was mechanically governed versus hydraulically. A glow system was used, and the Super Dexta was a reasonably good cold-starter.

The Super Dexta is noted for its nimbleness and high horsepower, making it a formidable choice for a variety of tasks. In practice, it competes effectively with models like the 2000 4-cylinder gas burner, showcasing robust performance throughout the day. Though slightly lighter, it can perform much like the 3000 model, offering reliability and efficiency.

Key Characteristics and Comparisons

• Engine Performance: The Super Dexta’s 3-cylinder diesel engine is distinct from the later Ford engines, known for its impressive performance, especially when contrasted with the 2000 3-cylinder diesel. While the exact comparison with the 2000 diesel remains speculative, the Super Dexta is often likened to the 3000model in terms of strength and horsepower.
• Horsepower and Displacement: With a Nebraska Test #844 rating of 38.8 PTO horsepower, closely matching the 3000 diesel’s 39.2, the Super Dexta offers competitive power. Its engine displacement of 153 cubic inches surpasses the older Dexta’s 144, contributing to its enhanced performance.
• Operational RPM: The engine’s capability to run at 2250 RPM, compared to the Dexta’s 2000, gives it an edge in power generation and operational efficiency.

Practical Considerations: Transmission, Parts, and Use

One notable advantage of the later Dexta and Super Dexta is the much slower low gear, making them especially useful for work requiring reduced speeds, such as operating a rototiller. In contrast, earlier North American 2000diesels were essentially rebadged Dextas. After 1964, however, the 2000 was completely redesigned along the lines of the 3000, with some compromises in construction and performance. The Super Dexta’s transmission allows for practical application in tasks that would otherwise be challenging with higher minimum speeds.

Limitations and Parts Availability

Despite its strengths, the Super Dexta has some limitations. It lacks power steering, which can affect maneuverability for some users. Additionally, sourcing parts can be challenging as they are primarily available in England and Europe. For those in North America, finding components can require extra effort due to the Super Dexta’s limited distribution outside the UK and other parts of Europe. Many parts are not shared with later Fordengines or commonly available Perkins units.

These factors should be considered by potential buyers looking for ease of maintenance and operation.

Overall, the Super Dexta combines a well-engineered engine with practical performance characteristics, making it a valuable asset for those needing a dependable tractor with a balance of power and agility. It remains a robust choice for those willing to navigate the challenges of sourcing parts, offering a rewarding experience for its users.

---